The only thing to keep in mind here is that Joomla's market share is declining, which is not the case with WordPress or Drupal. While Joomla is still in second place and won't be gone any time soon, there is something to be said for choosing a growing content management system when you look to the future. Downloaded more than 50 million times, Joomla has become one of the most used CMS in the last 6 years. It is currently the second most popular CMS solution after WordPress.
One of the main advantages of Joomla is that it supports the object-oriented programming language, which provides developers with maximum convenience to code their programs without any hassle. The elegant administration area offered by Joomla is simply incredible. Gives you the perfect experience of robust navigation and smooth functionality. The two templates, Protostar and Beez3, also include some new features that give you an elegant framework to work with.
If used correctly, it's a very powerful website building framework. Another good news is that with the release of the new version, Joomla has made some excellent improvements to the security framework, providing users with page and password hashing, multilingual compatibility, new RSS feed application and microdata documentation with MediaWiki working efficiently on the backend. There is always another side to an image. I covered the good side in the previous paragraph.
Now is the time to highlight the bad things: the gaps in Joomla. There are many reasons that count when it comes to realizing that Joomla lags behind WordPress and other CMS on some important fronts. Search engine optimization (SEO) is one of those areas, where Joomla tends to perform quite poorly compared to other CMS, especially WordPress. Although the development team behind Joomla is working hard, there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to SEO.
Another bug in Joomla is its repository of plugins and extensions. Although there are more than 7,700 extensions available, their functionality is restricted and many are outdated. In addition, there are hardly any as popular as those in the WordPress repository. The lack of regularly updated Joomla extensions has severely affected the overall functionality of the CMS.
Joomla developers need to work extensively to increase the number of user-friendly extensions in the repository. A common perception among ordinary users is that installing Joomla is a cumbersome process and working on it is even more difficult. The biggest disadvantage that hinders Joomla's current position among other CMS programs is that it doesn't provide anything new to users. The core functionality is fragile and is still based on old traditional semantics.
The CMS, in general, hasn't evolved as expected to such an extent, where Joomla could have challenged the supremacy of WordPress or Drupal, etc. According to this W3Techs chart, Joomla is in a very strange position. It is not used by “many sites” nor is it used by “high traffic sites”. Its position in the market as a CMS for “fewer sites” with “little traffic” is a sign of danger.
The most disturbing part is that Joomla's decline is real. Over the past year, its market share fell from 3.25% to almost 3%. This means that Joomla development talent is also shrinking, as is the possibility of inducing new talent. This downward trend has forced Joomla experts to worry about the future of Joomla.
The ongoing debate also casts doubt on its future and its ability to live up to the expectations that developers had of this easy-to-use content management system. Again, I must say that Joomla developers should focus on introducing modifications to the core functionality of the CMS, providing new avenues for users to explore in depth all the possibilities if they want to run an online business on Joomla. It will take time, but once you take the right step in the right direction, Joomla will be able to reap the benefits. Read the quote from Kaushal Patel's answer to Would Joomla be a good way to create a website for a new business? on Quora Read the quote from Frederike Ramm's answer to Would Joomla be a good way to create a website for a new business? on Quora Lower trends in Joomla market share may indicate the worst case scenario for Joomla as a CMS, but there is still a glimmer of hope for Joomla as an application platform.
Well, think of a future where Joomla is an application platform, rather than a full CMS. The new version of Joomla should emphasize the marketing of Joomla as an application platform, with some new features, each independent of the main Joomla code. This will provide a much cleaner and easier to use infrastructure to work with for appreciated Joomla lovers. Developers have a key role to play in this regard.
That said, Joomla faces some serious threats. Developers are required to research and improve coding features, making them easy for the ordinary Joomla user to use. The extension repository needs a full review. Meanwhile, search engine optimization techniques also need to be improved.
Where do you imagine your website in a few years? If you see it as a simple website with only minimal changes to features, then going to Joomla may be unnecessary. However, if you have big plans for your website and you see massive growth or the need to handle more complex data and content, then Joomla is going to be the best option. Overall, Joomla has always boasted a powerful set of features and has been very good at what it does. On the surface, there are a lot of similarities between WordPress and Joomla.
However, by diving into its usability, one is above the other in Joomla's confrontation against WordPress. WordPress started a long time ago as a system built for blogs, but since then it has expanded into all kinds of industries and sites for business owners. With an increasing number of features and a wide network of developers, it is exceptionally suitable for small businesses, online stores, blogs and other businesses. Joomla is a little more limited than WordPress, since it prioritizes the basics and does it well.
That said, it does offer some reliable capabilities. Your extensions have a two-step upload process, making it relatively easy to get started. With over 50,000 plug-ins, there's almost no feature that WordPress doesn't have. Even in its original state, it allows you to add and edit multiple users, as well as upload, store and use multimedia content.
In addition, WordPress comes SEO-ready, with HTML headers, tags, metadata and much more in its pre-designed themes. You can also use those 50,000 plug-ins to adjust the needs of your website. You can store your data securely with WordPress backups, add tools to monitor marketing analytics, post to social media, set up automation and much more. There is no competition with the extensive WordPress library and its well-stocked essentials; win this round.
Similar to Joomla, WordPress is also open source software, meaning you don't have a dedicated support team. But WordPress is such an important player in the world of CMS that very few resources are lacking. WordPress's own library of online resources is extensive and includes instructions, videos, FAQs and more. There is also a community forum where you can ask questions and WordPress developers can answer if they see them.
Although both systems seem to be on a level playing field, WordPress has more active users answering questions on community forums and a more comprehensive resource library, so it wins. If you're struggling to use CMS software efficiently, it's not adding value to your site's goals. So what is easier to use, WordPress or Joomla? Like Joomla, the ease of use of WordPress can be as simple or complex as you make it. However, unlike Joomla, it's easier to use and a little more intuitive.
It also allows you to make customizations within themes with ease and without having to go through hoops. With a full toolbar and dashboard navigation that makes sense, even newbies can quickly get comfortable with WordPress. It has a logical design and intuitive tools and lets you know when easy-to-install updates are available. Creating a WordPress site requires a bit of elevation, but the daily maintenance and use are quite simple.
WordPress wins as it is much more intuitive than Joomla and much easier to use. The costs of the WordPress website, compared to the costs of Joomla, are an important aspect to consider when budgeting. WordPress is also open source, and that means it's also free. You can download, use, maintain and update it for free forever.
WordPress, on the other hand, has an integration for almost every program that exists. Whether it's optimizing SEO for search engines, syncing with social sites like Facebook, integrating with your CRM and more, there's not much WordPress can't handle. It's a library of 50,000 plugins; you can connect WordPress to almost anything. The sum of the parts of WordPress is much greater than the whole, which makes it the winner of this round.
Since it's also open source, WordPress doesn't perform automatic security checks either. However, it does have high-performance cybersecurity add-ons and automated notifications of when updates are ready. Because WordPress is used a lot, it has to offer good security options. Because of its more agile and expansive approach, WordPress security is a little better.
Millions of people use WordPress for a reason. It has thousands of extensions that can take you from a simple site to a complete and robust CMS. In essence, WordPress is still quite easy to use and intuitive for small businesses. It's an excellent choice for a small business that needs an easy-to-manage CMS and outperforms Joomla in almost every category.
Every business is going through a rough patch and drifting into a downward curve along the way. Nowadays, it may be difficult for Joomla to compete with giants like WordPress, but it hasn't missed the opportunity to return. As a big CMS with an enthusiastic community, Joomla has a long competitive path, but it hasn't lost it yet. It's hard to tell who is the winner when it comes to Joomla vs WordPress in terms of customization and design.
Beyond these core developers, nearly 700,000 developers and users regularly interact on the Joomla forum to discuss software developments. This is something of a drop in market share relative to last year, but Joomla is still holding firm in the face of the growing wave of WordPress usage. Joomla offers 54 payment gateways that include free and paid extensions that allow you to accept any type of payment. It is not possible to give a specific account of the available templates, since the new ones are added both on the official Joomla website and by independent developers, but this wide range offers any user enormous flexibility in choosing the look of their website.
If you are somehow an expert in technical subjects and are looking for a more flexible CMS that allows you more creativity in your design, then Joomla could be your preferred option. While WordPress requires additional plugins to configure SSL, Joomla has its “Joomla Force SSL”, which allows users to activate the Joomla SSL certificate on their main system without installing any additional extensions. The negative attention that Joomla has encountered after its troubled history of security vulnerabilities has undoubtedly been at a great disadvantage for CMS. Against all odds and myths, Joomla has gained the continued trust of millions of users, including ours, which is a testament that Joomla is still relevant.
There is no specific industry that Joomla targets, and it works well for generic small businesses and even corporations. Joomla vs WordPress are recognized for their ease of use, extensive customization opportunities and active communities. Whether you want to create websites or develop templates and extensions, you can do it all with Joomla. Often, you'll find that WordPress websites get stuck with more advanced settings, something that Joomla is better suited to handle.
Joomla offers you many more options that you can configure in the backend without having to install additional plugins. I was of the firm opinion that the drop in Joomla statistics was largely due to the swarms of negative publicity that the CMS received after a series of potentially catastrophic security holes in the past. . .
