Behind WordPress, Joomla is the second most popular content management system, powering around 3% of all websites on the Internet and owning 5.4% of the content management systems market. Downloaded more than 50 million times, Joomla has become one of the most used CMS in the last 6 years. It is currently the second most popular CMS solution after WordPress. One of the main advantages of Joomla is that it supports the object-oriented programming language, which provides developers with maximum convenience to code their programs without any hassle.
The elegant administration area offered by Joomla is simply incredible. Gives you the perfect experience of robust navigation and smooth functionality. The two templates, Protostar and Beez3, also include some new features that give you an elegant framework to work with. If used correctly, it's a very powerful website building framework.
Another good news is that with the release of the new version, Joomla has made some excellent improvements to the security framework, providing users with page and password hashing, multilingual compatibility, new RSS feed application and microdata documentation with MediaWiki working efficiently on the backend. There is always another side to an image. I covered the good side in the previous paragraph. Now is the time to highlight the bad things: the gaps in Joomla.
There are many reasons that count when it comes to realizing that Joomla lags behind WordPress and other CMS on some important fronts. Search engine optimization (SEO) is one of those areas, where Joomla tends to perform quite poorly compared to other CMS, especially WordPress. Although the development team behind Joomla is working hard, there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to SEO. Another bug in Joomla is its repository of plugins and extensions.
Although there are more than 7,700 extensions available, their functionality is restricted and many are outdated. In addition, there are hardly any as popular as those in the WordPress repository. The lack of regularly updated Joomla extensions has severely affected the overall functionality of the CMS. Joomla developers need to work extensively to increase the number of user-friendly extensions in the repository.
A common perception among ordinary users is that installing Joomla is a cumbersome process and working on it is even more difficult. The biggest disadvantage that hinders Joomla's current position among other CMS programs is that it doesn't provide anything new to users. The core functionality is fragile and is still based on old traditional semantics. The CMS, in general, hasn't evolved as expected to such an extent, where Joomla could have challenged the supremacy of WordPress or Drupal, etc.
According to this W3Techs chart, Joomla is in a very strange position. It is not used by “many sites” nor is it used by “high traffic sites”. Its position in the market as a CMS for “fewer sites” with “little traffic” is a sign of danger. The most disturbing part is that Joomla's decline is real.
Over the past year, its market share fell from 3.25% to almost 3%. This means that Joomla development talent is also shrinking, as is the possibility of inducing new talent. This downward trend has forced Joomla experts to worry about the future of Joomla. The ongoing debate also casts doubt on its future and its ability to live up to the expectations that developers had of this easy-to-use content management system.
Again, I must say that Joomla developers should focus on introducing modifications to the core functionality of the CMS, providing new avenues for users to explore in depth all the possibilities if they want to run an online business on Joomla. It will take time, but once you take the right step in the right direction, Joomla will be able to reap the benefits. Read the quote from Kaushal Patel's answer to Would Joomla be a good way to create a website for a new business? on Quora Read the quote from Frederike Ramm's answer to Would Joomla be a good way to create a website for a new business? on Quora Lower trends in Joomla market share may indicate the worst case scenario for Joomla as a CMS, but there is still a glimmer of hope for Joomla as an application platform. Well, think of a future where Joomla is an application platform, rather than a full CMS.
The new version of Joomla should emphasize the marketing of Joomla as an application platform, with some new features, each independent of the main Joomla code. This will provide a much cleaner and easier to use infrastructure to work with for appreciated Joomla lovers. Developers have a key role to play in this regard. That said, Joomla faces some serious threats.
Developers are required to research and improve coding features, making them easy for the ordinary Joomla user to use. The extension repository needs a full review. Meanwhile, search engine optimization techniques also need to be improved. Today, Joomla exists and Mambo no longer exists.
Joomla's reputation for performance is very strong among the developer community, and for good reason. However, Joomla offers a few distinct benefits, making Joomla the second largest CMS platform. Since its inception, Joomla has grown both in popularity and functionality, with passionate collaborators adding to its selection of tools, extensions and themes. Nowadays, it may be difficult for Joomla to compete with giants like WordPress, but it hasn't missed the opportunity to return.
In Joomla, you can enable search engine friendly URLs, make them more readable and memorable for both humans and search engine crawlers. Joomla is the middle ground both in ease of use and capabilities, and it fits its function perfectly. Against all odds, Joomla has gained the continued trust of some of the giant business organizations, which in itself is a testament to the fact that Joomla is still there and still relevant. Joomla has long been seen as a “middle ground” between the ease of WordPress and the complexity and power of Drupal; the two most popular alternative content management systems.
It is not possible to give a specific account of the available templates, since the new ones are added both on the official Joomla website and by independent developers, but this wide range offers any user enormous flexibility in choosing the look of their website. These websites use the core functionality of the CMS, as well as the wide variety of extensions and templates to present in detail everything you can do with Joomla. So, although Joomla vs WordPress have their respective pros and cons, both can be perfect for creating modern, feature-rich sites. In fact, there are far more options for website development today than ever before, but it's ridiculous to say that an increase in WordPress adoption leads to a direct decline in legitimate Joomla use cases.
Due to its user-friendly framework and mobile responsiveness, big players have started to show their confidence in Joomla. Most of them are available for download from an ever-expanding list in the Joomla Extensions Directory, while others can be found with independent developers. . .
